|
And although Jane was diagnosed with Down syndrome when
she was four months old, there is no allusion to her disability in either
her accomplishments or her art.
Jane's parents were told their daughter was a "mongoloid"
and that they should "put her in an institution and forget about her."
Jane has always required the care of others. Yet As her mother, Alma,
recalls, "I treated her like any other little girl, right from the start.
That's the only thing I could think to do and I'm so glad I did."
So Jane spent the first six years of her life growing up
in India, where she was automatically different -- her gleaming blond
hair and deep blue eyes were enough for this. But among family and friends,
it was never mentioned that Jane had Down syndrome. Jane's parents were
not in denial, but they were not looking for an excuse to love their daughter
any less. Nor would they accept anything less than normal treatment towards
Jane from their friends.
With the transfer of her father to Montreal, the Camerons
set out to ensure the education of their children. All seemed to go well
until Jane's school changed directors and implemented a pedagogical doctrine
which professed that "these children needed no academic training apart
from street crossing signs, 'Danger' and 'Men' and 'Women.'"
Alma is still shocked as she recounts, "When I was in school,
we learned many things that didn't have direct applicability in life.
When I told the director this, he said, 'Yes, but that was to stretch
your mind.' And I thought, and why shouldn't this apply to Jane?"
Unwilling to accept that Jane deserved anything less in
life, the Camerons looked into the internationally renowned Doctor Franklin
Perkins School in Lancaster, Massachusetts.
Jane's enrolment at Perkins School provides an anecdote
which explains much of Jane's success in life. Jane was 13, yet the school
officials at Perkins wanted children to enter the school prior to age
12. Her parents were not dissuaded. They arranged for the director to
meet with Jane, and she was accepted. Likewise, 10 years later, Jane's
character brought her admittance to Le Fil d'Ariane in Montreal. And,
in 1980, Jane, speaking through her art, would earn herself a place at
the In-Definite Arts Society in Calgary -- even though her mother was
originally told that admission was restricted to people with physical
disabilities.
The principal medium used in Jane's art is textiles. Though
she had already learned to do some beautiful needlepoint while at Perkins
School, her enrolment at Le Fil d'Ariane meant enrolment in something
akin to an art school. Working in the atelier, Jane quickly demonstrated
that she was much more than a "stitcher" who followed patterns. Excelling
in her chosen craft, Jane became the atelier's chief designer. The result
is that huge tapestries were commissioned from such organizations as the
office of the Prime Minister, Mirabel Airport and Reader's Digest Canada.
Founded by Louise Cimon Annett, an art teacher from Les
Beaux Arts, when she became interested in helping people with intellectual
disabilities, Le Fil d'Ariane (literally, "Ariadne's Thread"), envisioned
itself as a kind of allegorical savior. Like Ariadne who gave Theseus
a spool of golden thread to lead him back out of the dark labyrinth once
he had slain the Minotaur, Madame Annett sought to use skeins of bright
wool to bring her apprentices into the world at large.
Empowered with the task of creating art, Jane was able
to achieve her stated purpose in leaving Perkins School -- to have a job
like anyone else her age.
This young woman, dubbed "our sunshine girl" by her parents,
stretched her golden thread into society's heart. Her work gained her
recognition and numerous commissions and champions. Among the first to
promote her accomplishments was her paediatrician, Dr. Granville Nickerson.
At a meeting of the Canadian Paediatric Society, he stated that "contrary
to the physician's conditioned expectations, [Jane] has brought joy and
satisfaction to both herself, her family and the community through the
development of her talent."
It was also near the beginning of Jane's career at Le Fil
d'Ariane that Dr. Max Klager, a German professor of art and education,
discovered her. In the few hours he had at the atelier before returning
to Germany, his "trip was made."
Dr. Klager championed Jane's work. He studied her art,
wrote books on her, and helped procure a one-woman exhibition of Jane's
art at the Heidelberg Textile Museum. But more than bringing her work
to the attention of the world, he gave Jane's work credibility. He defended
Jane as a "true artist" -- and "an artist doesn't need to explain."
With this statement, Jane grew in the esteem of her own
parents -- from a talented daughter to a gifted artist. Dr. Klager makes
it clear that Jane's work is far from a bunch of random shapes and stitches.
She expresses herself and her vision of life through colours, colours
that for her reflect an emotional state rather than the subject of her
art. Like the Impressionists, Jane has no desire to reproduce reality
-- though her private oils demonstrate that she was capable of doing so.
Her representations are interpretations, and they in turn arouse emotions
in the viewer.
And so it is that Jane's work has stood on its own without
mention of her disability. Pointing to an exhibition poster for Jane's
work, Carla Foster (a former instructor of Jane's at In-Definite Arts)
begins, "Jane's work doesn't say 'I am a disabled artist'" -- "it says,
'I see life as a bright and beautiful place,'" finishes Gene Neel (the
executive director of In-Definite Arts).
She has won juried competitions. Her work has been included
in exhibitions that travelled across Canada. It has been showcased in
numerous magazines and books on textile art. It hangs in the Esso Resources'
Collection. And it hangs in the Museum of Civilization in Ottawa.
While Jane's achievements could be for many the object
lessons telling society what can be achieved by people with disabilities,
ultimately Jane would stand up and say, "No, I am not a pioneer or a role
model." She sees the attention she has received as not owing to her disability
but owing to the fact her art deserves it. Jane is not an object lesson
for people with disabilities, but rather she is an object lesson for us
all. For Jane is the embodiment of life, and she has taken her gift and
given her vision of life to us all.
There are those who might say that in all of this, Jane
accomplished the unexpected. Should we be surprised that Jane is a great
artist because she has Down syndrome? Jane has accomplished all that she
has because her parents and friends never gave up on her. As Gene Neel
explains, "I doubt Jane was ever told she couldn't do something." Jane
was never locked away; she was never locked out of her parents' hearts.
Should we be shocked that a child given opportunities,
support and love is able to give back a satisfied life? No, we should
be shocked that there are those who believe not all children deserve this.
Sadly, as you read this, the chapter on Jane's life as
an artist has closed. With the passing of her father a few years ago,
Jane's condition seems to have declined. Her eyesight has deteriorated
to the point that she can no longer distinguish figures. She is almost
completely unable to communicate anymore; the few words she can muster
are always about her father. She can no longer grasp a pencil.
But Jane’s accomplishments deserve attention. At the continuing
care facility to which she recently moved, her room is filled with swimming
medals and bowling trophies, representative of a once strong and bright
Jane Cameron who was an integral part of the Canadian Special Olympics
team which competed in New York, in 1979; a Jane Cameron whose work hangs
in venues around the world. This is a Jane Cameron who has lived well
and accomplished a great deal.
-- Dale Schierbeck
From Abilities Magazine, Issue 39
|